探索人文社會學者研究產出之總合軌跡：以臺灣大學人文社會高等研究院為例

Exploring the Composite Trace of Research Outputs of Humanities and Social Sciences Scholars: A Case Study of the Institute for Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences at National Taiwan University

本研究以臺灣大學人文社會高等研究院學者為代表，探索人文學與社會科學學者研究產出之總合軌跡，選擇THCI、ACI、WOS與Scopus四個引文索引資料庫，以及社群媒體Mendeley做為研究工具，比較分析學者著作的學術被引與網路使用。結果顯示學者著作的語言以中文為主；在臺灣的引文索引資料庫，學者的中文著作遠比英文著作更常被引用，臺灣的引文索引資料庫中的被引筆數，也遠多於國際的引文索引資料庫，可見學者研究產出的影響力仍多侷限於臺灣。此外，國際的引文索引資料庫的被引著作數量與Mendeley中的學者著作數量有高度相關，顯示Mendeley亦能反映著作在國際的學術影響力。

In this study, we used the citation data from four databases (THCI, ACI, WOS and Scopus) and one social media, Mendeley, to examine the composite traces of humanities and social sciences scholars' research outputs. Using the researchers of the Institute for Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences in National Taiwan University as subjects, this study compared how the scholars' publications were cited in Taiwan's and international academic journals as well as used in the social Web. It found that most of the subjects' publications were in Chinese, and the impact of the publications was domestic rather than international. Taiwan's citation databases, unsurprisingly, saw more citations to their research outputs. However, when only the English publications were observed, it was found that the citation performances in international databases and Mendeley were highly correlated. This suggests that Mendeley is a valid altmetric citation source for observing the international impact of Taiwan's scholars.