英文摘要 |
To prevent harms on human subjects in clinical trials, institutional review board (IRB) plays the essential gatekeeper role in the review process. However, members of IRB might face conflicts of interest by themselves because of personal or institutional financial interest, which have not been clearly regulated in Taiwan. This paper introduces relevant American rules and opinions from international academia, and lists five regulatory principles, including public disclosure, enhancing the independency of IRB, withdrawal, continuing monitor, and establishing national injuries compensation fund, and to be reference for making the relevant rules in Taiwan. |