英文摘要 |
Considering precedent studies on Hanfeizi, this essay presents three questions and attempts to give a solution to them. First, it is said that the theoretical framework of Hanfeizi belongs to the Huang-Lao school of thought. Still, we need to know the exact relation between them and whether they are consistent with each other or not. Second, Hanfeizi offers much discussion on the self-interested orientation of humans and the necessity of conflict with others. However, does this exactly mean that Hanfeizi recognizes the legitimacy of conflict? If we see Hanfeizi in a Huang-Lao perspective, we will find that the core concepts of its theoretical construction are 'sheng ren (the sage),' and 'shen ming (the spirit).' Tao presents itself in this world through 'de (virtue or energy)' and 'li (principles),' while the sage cultivates himself to foster virtue and lead to 'shen ming (spirit)' thereby able to achieve incomparable excellence in thinking, which is useful to transform 'li' into actual regulations. Once attained 'shen ming,' the sage would be able to link 'nature' and 'human affairs' together. Therefore, we may conclude that, the content of Hanfeizi is consistent with the theories of the Huang- Lao school of thought, Moreover, by understanding the concept of the sage in Hanfeizi, one may acknowledge that man's infinite inflation of desire leading to conflict is not a universal condition. People can look forward to a sage who humbles himself and gives judicious guidance to cure disorder and conflicts. The sage searches himself into nature and human affairs, and exerts tao when playing different political roles. |