英文摘要 |
The co-opetition (collaboration and competition) members in a virtual enterprise still have many aftereffects to be studied. Several questions mentioned by Mishira and Vaysman (2001) are resolved in this paper. Considering two members in a virtual enterprise, one originator and one participator, the cost system choice for the VE members are explored with the intra- and inter-member knowledge asymmetry (KA)-activity-based costing (ABC) vs. traditional system. The main results are that: (i) There is a trade-off relationship among VE members' benefits. It seems reasonable to consider cost system choice decision for both coopetition members through the avenue of Nash equilibrium. (ii) The Nash equilibrium always occurs when both members adopt ABC with larger intra- and inter-member knowledge uncertainties. In other words, both members adopt ABC system could moderate the intra-and inter-member KA. (iii) When we set a knowledge interval to be larger for one member and a knowledge interval to be smaller for the other, one member with higher intra-member KA will adopt ABC and the other will adopt traditional system with lower intra-member KA. (iv) Given one co-opetition member's cost system choice and knowledge interval, it is also demonstrated that the other member adopting ABC system will moderate intra-member KA and further generate higher expected profits. Numerical analyses are provided to illustrate the proposed models. |