教育大學教師評鑑指標系統建構之研究--以屏東教育大學為例

The Establishment of Universities of Education's Faculty Evaluation System--An Example of National Pingtung University of Education

高等教育教師評鑑的目的為提升教師專業品質，並提供學校作為人事考核之依據。台灣各教育大學在民國九十四年八月一日均由師範學院改名為教育大學，且紛紛積極轉型，各教育大學不再全面培養師資，因此，各系所教師之專業發展是否能符合學校轉型之需求？實為各教育大學欲探求之核心問題之一，而大多數學校現有之「學生評量教師教學意見調查表」，因改名教大學及轉型之關係，已不符合教師評鑑之全面性使用，故本研究之目的在瞭解教育大學教師對大學教師專業的認知，建構適合教育大學之教師評鑑內容面向與具體評鑑指標，並以屏東教育大學為例，訂出具體之評鑑指標供屏東教育大學及其他各教育大學實際應用及參考之用。本研究提出兩個主要研究問題：1.適用於教育大學之教師評鑑內容面向為何?2.適用於教育大學之教師評鑑指標系統為何?並採用專家訪談法、焦點團體法、德懷術問卷調查法、公聽會等作為本研究主要的研究方法，從研究資料中歸納出具體的研究、教學、輔導與服務等內涵，結合教育大學中各學院的發展與學術特色，並配合屏東教育大學實際運作之結果，建構出44個教師評鑑指標以及評分方式。最後根據研究結果提出結論與建議。

The study is to understand faculties’ ideas toward faculties’ profession in universities of education， using National Pingtung University of Education as a sample， to develop proper faculty evaluation content and concrete indicators. So that National Pingtung University of Education and other universities of education can use the results as a basis for their own application. Two main research questions are as follows: 1.What are the proper contents of faculty evaluation in universities of education? 2. What are the faculty evaluation indicators of universities of education? The researchers use in-depth interviews， focus group interview， and Delphi oracle as the main research methods. From data collection and data analysis， the researchers identify concrete contents as teaching， research， service and guidance. Combing with specialties of each college in Pingtung universities of education and its actual running results， the researchers develop 44 faculty evaluation indicators and scoring system. Based on the results， the researchers also propose conclusions and suggestions.