當前國內教育學術期刊編審制度之檢討：教育學者如何在良性學術互動中集體成長？

An Examination on the Editinging and Review Mechanism of Taiwan Educational Journals: How to Achieve Educationalists' Collective Growth in the Benign Academic Interaction?

雖然國科會已完成三次國內教育期刊評比研究，但是筆者還沒看到有出版的學術論文對國內教育學術期刊編審制度做廣汎的檢討。本文則廣汎地檢討對當前教育期刊編審制度有重大影響的TSSCI制度，與TSSCI制度所帶來的編審制度之高退稿率迷思與教育學發展困境，以及高退率下的惡質評審倫理問題，指出「教育學者正在追求集體的自我毀滅」；並透過跨學門或領域比較，特別是與社會學比較，對教育期刊可以考慮的努力方向提出建議，期盼有助於『教育學者在良性學術互動中集體成長』，以及整個教育學門之發展。本文所提出的建議如下：一、邁向E化：用E-mail隨到隨審。二、破除高退稿率迷失與建立優良評審制度。三、建立有條件的申訴管道與評審黑名單。四、投稿者付費。

Although National Science Council had completed three times evaluations of education journals, the reseacher has not read the paper widely examined the editing and review mechanism of education journals in Taiwan yet. The purposes of this study were to widely examine the TSSCI mechanism which has a heavy influence on the editing and review mechanism of education journals, and the myth of high rejected rate and the problems of education development influenced by TSSCI mechanism, and the ethical problems of vicious reviewers. Meanwhile, this study indicated 'Educationalist is pursuing self-destruction collectively.' Moreover, comparing with across disciplines or areas, sociology particularly, the author offered some suggestions to education journals. The author looks forword to fostering 'educational scholars to achieve their collective growth in the benign academic interaction ' and the development of the entire education discipline. The suggestions of this study are as follows. First, tend to electronicalization： such as the instant editing and review mechanism with E-mail. Second, break down the myth of high rejected rate and to establish the review mechanism. Third, bulid up the conditional grievance channel and the blacklist of reviewers. Fourth, set up the submitter-pay protocol.