英文摘要 |
Information technology and internet applications have increasingly become multidimensional. In addition to companies using such applications in work areas as means to boost their competitiveness, the information technology has also been widely employed and become the indispensable tool in people’s everyday life. Moreover, information technology is getting more complicated; its implementation and performance costs keep rising; given the fluctuating highs and lows of usage rate, the implementation and performance of information technology will be a major issue, and the failure in information system execution will ultimately lead to costly investments. In the past several years, users’ behavior in the explanation and prediction of technology acceptance has become an important area of the information system research, focusing on the causal links in the usage behavior toward the explanation and prediction of information system. Even though there has been a prolific stream of models being presented, the one published in 1989 by Fred Davis entitled “Technology Acceptance Model, TAM” is by far the most widely employed one. Therefore, either for the research in the technology acceptance usage behavior or the business community, it is both extremely important and fundamental to fully understand the Technology Acceptance Model. This paper traces TAM’s development in accordance with literature review methodology and summarizes research results. First, it introduces the technology acceptance concept model and the TAM’s development, from its initial proposal followed by the subsequent modifications. Second, it characterizes TAM’s development in terms of model examinations, model extensions, and model interpretations. It is then followed by expounding the relationships among TAM’s variables, summarizing important external variables, and explaining the impact of external variables on a couple of important TAM’s beliefs (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use) by means of in-depth investigation and analysis. Finally, through a systematic classification, this paper explains the TAM’s major restrictions and offers additional critiques as well as overall conclusions and recommendations for future research directions. |